RE: OT - CallManager and NAT

From: Jojo jojo (barrerj1@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 29 2006 - 15:41:56 ART


Look at this doc and see if you can get it working

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/sec_vir/udp_tcp/41plrev2.pdf
hth
JoJo

>From: Andi Bennett <bigandibennett@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Andi Bennett <bigandibennett@yahoo.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: OT - CallManager and NAT
>Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:50:11 -0800 (PST)
>
>Sorry for the off topic here but this has me a bit stumped.
>
>I have Cisco IP
>Phones on the "outside " of the network connecting to a CM on the "inside"
>of
>the network.
>Now, the phones can alternate TFTP to the CM, they then get an
>image, but they the try and connect to the real addresses of the CM's,
>which
>is obviously unroutable on the outside.
>
>I have
>
>ip nat outisde source static
>configured to get the phones to the CM. I think the problem is that the
>return TFTP image has the embedded real addresses of the CM in it.
>
>as a run
>down of config I have
>
>ip nat outside source static 10.18.192.10 172.27.10.1
>(Publisher + TFTP server)
>ip nat outside source static 10.18.192.11
>172.27.10.2 (CM1)
>ip nat outside source static 10.18.192.12 172.27.10.3 (CM2)
>The phones get the image, then keep trying to connect tot he 10.18.192.x
>addresses
>
>I've looked at using the ip nat service port sccp command, but it
>seems to have no effect as the phones still try to connect to the real CM
>addresses, not my staic NAT entries.
>
>Is what I'm trying to do possible, or am
>I barking up the wrong tree??
>
>Any advice would be appreciated.
>
>Cheers
>Andy.
>
>
>
>___________________________________________________________
>Now
>you can scan emails quickly with a reading pane. Get the new Yahoo! Mail.
>http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:49 ART