From: CharlesB (cbalik@adelphia.net)
Date: Tue Nov 28 2006 - 22:53:07 ART
Just how IOS functions, not specific to RIP.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O [mailto:mikeeo@email.msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:44 PM
To: Brian Dennis; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: cbalik@adelphia.net
Subject: Re: RIP and connected
Actually I do, but its tagging routes, does that mean everytime I use a
route-map I have to match connected interfaces? or is this case specific to
RIP only?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
To: "Mike O" <mikeeo@email.msn.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 8:37 PM
Subject: RE: RIP and connected
Are you redistributing connected routes into OSPF and using a route-map?
If so permit in the route-map the connected interfaces that RIP is
running on.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Mike O
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:30 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RIP and connected
Hey All, I have a situation in my lab where I put an interface into rip
which connects to the back bone , but when I redistribute RIP into OSPF
on
the same router the rip routes from the back bone come over, but not the
rip
connected route. Any ideas?
-Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:49 ART