3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?

From: elias.chari@gmail.com
Date: Thu Nov 23 2006 - 19:12:23 ART

• Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: 3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?"
• Previous message: Lab Rat #109385382: "RE: AAA Accounting Question"
• Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: 3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "RE: 3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?"
• Maybe reply: Elias Chari: "Re: 3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

In the 3560 configuration guide, it is recommended that when configuring Private VLANs to use "sdm prefer default" and with IPv6 "sdm prefer dual-ipv4-and-ipv6 default" should be used. I have a couple of questions:

1. Does this mean that the switch will not support both P-VLANs and IPv6 if "sdm prefer dual-ipv4-and-ipv6 default" is used?

This also seems to be implied by the "sdm" command reference, Table 2-16.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/cr/cli2.htm#wp6900853

2. Also if the command is left to the default "sdm prefer default" will the switch support both P-VLANs and IPv6?

I currently don't have access to 3560's to test it, so your input will be appreciated.

Thanks
Elias

• Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: 3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?"
• Previous message: Lab Rat #109385382: "RE: AAA Accounting Question"
• Next in thread: Brian Dennis: "RE: 3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?"
• Maybe reply: Brian Dennis: "RE: 3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?"
• Maybe reply: Elias Chari: "Re: 3560 Private-VLANs and IPV6 are they mutually exclussive?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART