From: Deji Steve-Fagbemi (deji500@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 21 2006 - 20:49:19 ART
That's the problem, I am not trying to form an adjacency between the two
routers. They are not directly connected and there is no frame-relay PVC
between them. It appears that the local router is mapping to the remote
router's IP address even though frame inverse arp has been disabled on the
local router for the DLCI of the remote router.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex De Gruiter [mailto:Alex.deGruiter@didata.com.au]
Sent: 21 November 2006 23:33
To: deji500@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: EIGRP Hello packets
It looks like the remote router interface is setup as 130.1.124.1,
however your Serial1/0 interface on the local router is setup as
130.1.234.2. EIGRP can't form an adjacency for neighbors that are not on
the same connected subnet.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
deji500@hotmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, 22 November 2006 9:49 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: EIGRP Hello packets
Hi all,
Can someone please tell me why i am getting this error message on this
router even though Frame-relay inverse arp has been turned off on the
DLCI associated with that this IP address:
IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:100): Neighbor 130.1.124.1 not on
common subnet for Serial1/0
This is the frame map statement on the router with the error:
Rack1R3#sh frame map
Serial1/0 (up): ip 130.1.234.2 dlci 516(0x204,0x8040), dynamic,
broadcast,, status defined, active Serial1/0 (up): ip
130.1.234.4 dlci 518(0x206,0x8060), dynamic,
broadcast,, status defined, active
Serial1/1 (up): ip 130.1.35.5 dlci 910(0x38E,0xE0E0), static,
broadcast,
CISCO, status defined, active
Thanks for your anticipated help
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART