do i need "reversible" keyword?

From: Michael Zuo (mzuo@ixiacom.com)
Date: Mon Nov 20 2006 - 22:23:56 ART

• Next message: Bob Sinclair: "RE: question about Frame Relay policy map"
• Previous message: Michael Zuo: "question about Frame Relay policy map"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi there,

If I have

10.0.0.1---f0/1-----R1---f0/0----20.0.0.1

                           |

                           |

                  F0/2 30.0.0.1

to make a PC at 20.0.0.2 available as SSH server on the 10.0.0.x
network:

            interface f0/0

                        ip address 10.0.0.1 ...

                        ip nat inside

            interface f0/1

                        ip address 20.0.0.1 ...

                        ip nat outside

            interface f0/2

                        ip address 30.0.0.1 ...

                        ip nat outside

            ip nat inside source static tcp 20.0.0.2 22 10.0.0.1 22
extendable

do I need "reversible" keyword? Or is it automatically reversible for
all static NAT?

It is not clear at all from the doc CD....

Thanks!

• Next message: Bob Sinclair: "RE: question about Frame Relay policy map"
• Previous message: Michael Zuo: "question about Frame Relay policy map"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:48 ART