From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Nov 19 2006 - 19:47:56 ART
As long as you have some way to do route recursion for traffic
going out the tunnel then yes it is fine. You may need to run a dynamic
routing protocol or configure a static /32 route out the tunnel for the
IP address on the remote end.
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP)
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Andre Serrao
> Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 3:28 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Tunnel with ip addresses in different subnets
>
> Is it possible to have a functional tunnel when ip addresses on both
ends
> are in different subnets?
>
> Example: Tunnel between R1 and R2
>
>
> R1:
> int loop1
> ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
> int tunnel 0
> ip unnumbered lo1
> tunnel source serial 0/0
> tunnel source 148.1.0.2
>
>
> R2:
> int loop1
> ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
>
> int tunnel0
> ip unnumbered lo1
> tunnel source serial 0/0
> tunnel destination 148.1.0.1
>
>
> I just made up the above example, but in many labs, we have the
> restriction
> of adding new ip addresses, and the only way I see to fix that is by
using
> one of the local interfaces.
>
> Appreciate your feedback. Thanks,
>
> Andre
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:47 ART