From: Bajo (bajoalex@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 15 2006 - 09:08:52 ART
Trying to figure out which one of the two load-balancing methods will
increase "channel efficiency"? Or is there any other method?
Thanks in advance for any comments.....
On 11/15/06, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim@orcsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Since etherchannel will load-balance on source and/or destination
> IP/MAC, you'll never get 300 mbps per specific host pair. Here it works
> not like MLPPP aggregation.
>
> To test you may push bulky traffic from three source hosts to one
> destination and tune load-balancing accordingly, then check TX/RX load
> on channel member interfaces.
>
> HTH
> A.
>
> Yoshe Rionando wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> > How to verify speed of etherchannel. For example if i configure 3 port
> > fastethernet to etherchannel, how can i verify that speed is 300 mbps?
> >
> >
> > Yoshe Rionando Y.
> > PT. Swadharma Duta Data
> > Network & System Engineering Dept.
> > Senior Network Engineer
> > phone : 62 21 8318881
> > fax : 62 21 8297293
> > mobile : 62 8159084895
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Kind Regards,Bajo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:47 ART