From: Adam Frederick (AFrederick@homefederalbank.com)
Date: Wed Nov 15 2006 - 10:38:49 ART
Really the best way I've found is to watch packets output/input counters
across member links and see that they are incrementing appropriately.
If not, experiment w/ the different methods, it won't hurt. Destination
Src MAC is usually left alone, but I've changed this a few times.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bajo
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 7:09 AM
To: Alexei Monastyrnyi
Cc: Yoshe Rionando; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Etehrchannel
Trying to figure out which one of the two load-balancing methods will
increase "channel efficiency"? Or is there any other method?
Thanks in advance for any comments.....
On 11/15/06, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim@orcsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Since etherchannel will load-balance on source and/or destination
> IP/MAC, you'll never get 300 mbps per specific host pair. Here it
works
> not like MLPPP aggregation.
>
> To test you may push bulky traffic from three source hosts to one
> destination and tune load-balancing accordingly, then check TX/RX
load
> on channel member interfaces.
>
> HTH
> A.
>
> Yoshe Rionando wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> > How to verify speed of etherchannel. For example if i configure 3
port
> > fastethernet to etherchannel, how can i verify that speed is 300
mbps?
> >
> >
> > Yoshe Rionando Y.
> > PT. Swadharma Duta Data
> > Network & System Engineering Dept.
> > Senior Network Engineer
> > phone : 62 21 8318881
> > fax : 62 21 8297293
> > mobile : 62 8159084895
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:47 ART