From: Aaron Pilcher (apilcher@itgcs.com)
Date: Mon Nov 13 2006 - 23:26:49 ART
Personally I prefer policing to rate-limiting. At the end of the day they
are the same, know them both it will not hurt.
If you meet the requirement while not stepping outside of the guidelines,
you get the points.
Aaron Pilcher, CCIE #17168
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Adhu
Ajit
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 7:20 PM
To: Vishal Patel; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Rate Limit vs Police
Vishal, thanks for your answer.
But my real question was:
"Folks, as I understand both do the same thing, just that there are 2
different ways.
Does it matter which one I choose for a particular implementation ? Does
Cisco prefer one over the other for different situations ?"
Thank you.
Vishal Patel <vpatel@accessproviders.com.au> wrote:
Rate limit is policing..
It will drop the packets after the rate limit is reached.
Traffic shaping is delaying...the packets will be delayed after a
particular limit is reached.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Adhu
Ajit
Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 10:34 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Rate Limit vs Police
Folks, as I understand both do the same thing, just that there are 2
different ways.
Does it matter which one I choose for a particular implementation ? Does
Cisco prefer one over the other for different situations ?
Any comments will be much appreciated.
Thank you.
---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:46 ART