IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question

From: Lab Rat #109385382 (techlist01@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 12 2006 - 04:34:26 ART

• Next message: Ben Zheng: "how to monitor the snmp traps"
• Previous message: Lab Rat #109385382: "RE: "host" keyward"
• Next in thread: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question"
• Maybe reply: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question"
• Maybe reply: Lab Rat #109385382: "RE: IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question"
• Maybe reply: Javier Liendo: "Re: IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Is it safe to say that, if RouterA has a static crypto map statement (with
"set peer") and the RouterB has a dynamic crypto map (sans "set peer"), that
RouterB will never initiate the connection to RouterA? Only RouterA can
initiate the connection?

I'm trying to simulate, but the routers automatically keep bringing the
tunnels back up every time I tear them down.

Appreciate the advice.

Thanks,

Ed

• Next message: Ben Zheng: "how to monitor the snmp traps"
• Previous message: Lab Rat #109385382: "RE: "host" keyward"
• Next in thread: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question"
• Maybe reply: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question"
• Maybe reply: Lab Rat #109385382: "RE: IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question"
• Maybe reply: Javier Liendo: "Re: IOS-to-IOS IPSec Tunnel Question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:46 ART