From: Antigen_LAGMAIL02@groupstudy.com
Date: Mon Nov 06 2006 - 09:23:48 ART
The entire message "Re: BSR - hash mask length field", originally sent to you by nobody@groupstudy.com (nobody@groupstudy.com), has been forwarded to you from the Antigen Quarantine area.
This message may have been re-scanned by Antigen and handled according to the appropriate scan job's settings.
<<Entire Message.eml>>
Received: from lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by
lagmail02.resourcery.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 6
Nov 2006 13:20:24 +0100
Received: (from sympa@localhost) by lists.groupstudy.com
(8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id kA6C1MRw029992; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:01:22
-0500
Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.51.144.7]) by
lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
kA6C0mr9029982 for <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2006
07:00:49 -0500
Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1]) by
groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kA6C0nC2002767
GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:00:49 -0500
Received: (from listserver@localhost) by groupstudy.com
(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id kA6C0nlm002765 for
ccielabxhiddenx; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:00:49 -0500
Received: from ivan.iip.net (ivan.iip.net [195.178.193.69]) by
groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kA6C0lS5002735
GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:00:48 -0500
Received: from ivan.iip.net (ivan.iip.net [127.0.0.1]) by ivan.iip.net
(8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kA6C0dn8001920; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:00:39
+0300
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by ivan.iip.net
(8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id kA6C0bwK001917; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:00:37
+0300
X-Authentication-Warning: ivan.iip.net: ivan set sender to ivan@iip.net
using -f
From: Ivan <ivan@iip.net>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com, "Cisco Key" <ciscokey@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: BSR - hash mask length field
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:00:37 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
Cc: "Adhu Ajit" <adhu_ajit@yahoo.com>
References: <20061103222658.32616.qmail@web61011.mail.yahoo.com>
<6e62bbbd0611051307qfa76c2bqe49e2ed69a7db83d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6e62bbbd0611051307qfa76c2bqe49e2ed69a7db83d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200611061500.37450.ivan@iip.net>
X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from ivan@iip\.net] (2006/11/06 07:00:49)
Sender: nobody@groupstudy.com
Reply-To: Ivan <ivan@iip.net>
X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com
X-Sequence: 2922
Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
Precedence: bulk
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <ccielab.groupstudy.com>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=subscribe%20ccielab>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=unsubscribe%20ccielab>
List-Post: <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
List-Owner: <mailto:ccielab-request@groupstudy.com>
Return-Path: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2006 12:20:27.0505 (UTC)
FILETIME=[F1694610:01C7019D]
IMO it is not nessesary such distribution of RP. May be
1, 3, 5, 7
0, 2, 4, 6
This depend of hash algorithm.
May be lab it up help understanding.
On Monday 06 November 2006 00:07, Cisco Key wrote:
> Correct me if I am wrong but its seen the same as a Subnet Mask
> So for example
>
> 225.1.1.0
> 225.1.1.1
> 225.1.1.2
> 225.1.1.3
> 225.1.1.4
> 225.1.1.5
> 225.1.1.6
> 225.1.1.7
>
> Statement would be - #ip pim bsr-candidate loopback 29 as in /29
>
> If you want to load balance then
> 225.1.1.0
> 225.1.1.1
> 225.1.1.2
> 225.1.1.3
>
> Statement would be - #ip pim bsr-candidate loopback 30 as in /30
>
> 225.1.1.4
> 225.1.1.5
> 225.1.1.6
> 225.1.1.7
>
> Statement would be - #ip pim bsr-candidate loopback 30 as in /30
>
> Please tell me if this is correct
>
> Regards
> Paul
>
> On 03/11/06, Adhu Ajit <adhu_ajit@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > ip pim bsr-candidate [intf] [hash-mask-length] [priority}
> >
> > I looked this up in the Cisco CD and I got:
> >
> > hash-mask-length: Length of a mask (32 bits maximum) that is to be ANDed
> > with the group address before the hash function is called. All groups
> > with the same seed hash (correspond) to the same RP. For example, if this
> > value is 24, only the first 24 bits of the group addresses matter. This
> > fact allows you to get one RP for multiple groups.
> >
> >
> > I dont fully understand this option. Can someone please explain with an
> > example ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adhu.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- Ivan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART