From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 30 2006 - 00:48:21 ART
Authentication can work but I can also intercept your multicast EIGRP packets.
Read the question carefully, they may want discrete unicast EIGRP packets only.
On 10/30/06, Adam Frederick <AFrederick@homefederalbank.com> wrote:
> ?
> Emil;
>
> Is using authentication forbidden? If not, that would be an acceptable
> setup. I'm not sure if your task asks to only allow R5 & R6 to become
> neighbors, but if not, passive-interface default will work & of course
> entering "no passive fa0/0" on R5 & "no passive e0/0" on R6.
> ________________________________
>
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Emil Patel
> Sent: Sun 10/29/2006 2:58 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc: nobody@groupstudy.com
> Subject: EIGRP Updates
>
>
>
> If the question asked to only send eigrp updates to r5 fa0/0 and r6 e0/0
> does it implies that updates should be sent unicast with the use neighbor
> statement.
>
>
>
> Will use of passive default statement accomplish same thing? Using neighbor
> statement the updates will be sent unicast, but suppressing hello with
> passive interface the updates are sent multicast.
>
>
>
> Can some one shed some light on when to use neighbor v/s passive interface
> command.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:07 ART