From: Adam Frederick (AFrederick@homefederalbank.com)
Date: Mon Oct 30 2006 - 00:31:32 ART
?
Emil;
Is using authentication forbidden? If not, that would be an acceptable setup. I'm not sure if your task asks to only allow R5 & R6 to become neighbors, but if not, passive-interface default will work & of course entering "no passive fa0/0" on R5 & "no passive e0/0" on R6.
________________________________
From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Emil Patel
Sent: Sun 10/29/2006 2:58 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: EIGRP Updates
If the question asked to only send eigrp updates to r5 fa0/0 and r6 e0/0
does it implies that updates should be sent unicast with the use neighbor
statement.
Will use of passive default statement accomplish same thing? Using neighbor
statement the updates will be sent unicast, but suppressing hello with
passive interface the updates are sent multicast.
Can some one shed some light on when to use neighbor v/s passive interface
command.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:07 ART