RE: are these two the same thing?

From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sun Oct 29 2006 - 00:23:54 ART

• Next message: haducbinh: "MIB Objects"
• Previous message: Michael Zuo: "are these two the same thing?"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Zuo: "are these two the same thing?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

The second one would presume that all of your client devices were configured
to receive/process broadcasts on that address. But otherwise, seems like a
feasible approach (never had a desire to try it, but seems logical!)...

HTH,

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Zuo
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 11:18 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: are these two the same thing?

Hi Group,

Are the following two configurations the same thing and would work exactly
the same way?

A)

Interface f0/0

            ip multicast helper-map 225.25.25.25 129.1.23.255 111

B)

Interface f0/0

            ip broadcast-addresss 129.1.23.0

            ip multicast helper-map 225.25.25.25 129.1.23.0 111

Thanks!!

• Next message: haducbinh: "MIB Objects"
• Previous message: Michael Zuo: "are these two the same thing?"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Zuo: "are these two the same thing?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:07 ART