MQC Traffic Policing

From: Udo (ccie_groupstudy@yahoo.de)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2006 - 16:09:22 ART

• Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: broken route-map after TCL ?"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Another has passed the BEAST!!!!"
• Next in thread: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Maybe reply: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Maybe reply: Pierre-Alex GUANEL: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Maybe reply: Pierre-Alex GUANEL: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Maybe reply: Frank: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,

can anyone explain me the difference between the following configs

1.
class-map match-all FILESHARE
 match protocol kazaa2
!
!
policy-map SHAPE
 class FILESHARE
   police 8000
 class class-default
  shape average 5000000 160000 80000

2.
class-map match-all FILESHARE
 match protocol kazaa2
!
!
policy-map QOS
 class FILESHARE
  police cir 8000
policy-map SHAPE
 class class-default
  shape average 5000000 160000 80000
  service-policy QOS

interface Serial0/0
 encapsulation frame-relay
.....
 service-policy output SHAPE
...

Thanks for the help....

udo

• Next message: Brian Dennis: "RE: broken route-map after TCL ?"
• Previous message: Scott Morris: "RE: Another has passed the BEAST!!!!"
• Next in thread: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Maybe reply: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Maybe reply: Pierre-Alex GUANEL: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Maybe reply: Pierre-Alex GUANEL: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Maybe reply: Frank: "Re: MQC Traffic Policing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART