Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)

From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2006 - 04:17:16 ART

• Next message: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: Trunking between a 3550, and a 3548xl!"
• Previous message: Ben Zheng: "SP Lab in San Jose"
• Maybe in reply to: Roberto Fernandez: "Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi.

I think if odd numbers are 1,3,5 .... and even ones are 2,4,6.... we
should just list either of them. Why would it be connected to
native/no-native VLAN at all?

Or do I miss something from your Q?

A.

Roberto Fernandez wrote:
> Live saver friends,
>
>
>
> Looks like a silly question... I know... but right now I'm confused even
> when I think I have the answers...
>
>
>
> 1- If we are asked to allow only ODD Vlans o a trunk?
>
> a. should we include if it IS tagged?
>
> b. Should we include it IS NOT tagged?
>
>
>
> 2- If we are asked to make a switch root for ODD vlans
>
> a. Should we include the native VLAN?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Roberto
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: Trunking between a 3550, and a 3548xl!"
• Previous message: Ben Zheng: "SP Lab in San Jose"
• Maybe in reply to: Roberto Fernandez: "Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART