Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)

From: Roberto Fernandez (rofernandez@us.telefonica.com)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2006 - 17:35:20 ART

Next message: Sasa Milic: "Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Previous message: Aaron Weaver: "DMVPN AND TRAFFIC SHAPPING"
Next in thread: Sasa Milic: "Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Maybe reply: Sasa Milic: "Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Maybe reply: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com: "RE: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Maybe reply: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Live saver friends,

Looks like a silly question... I know... but right now I'm confused even
when I think I have the answers...

1- If we are asked to allow only ODD Vlans o a trunk?

a. should we include if it IS tagged?

b. Should we include it IS NOT tagged?

2- If we are asked to make a switch root for ODD vlans

a. Should we include the native VLAN?

Best Regards,

Roberto

Next message: Sasa Milic: "Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Previous message: Aaron Weaver: "DMVPN AND TRAFFIC SHAPPING"
Next in thread: Sasa Milic: "Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Maybe reply: Sasa Milic: "Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Maybe reply: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com: "RE: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Maybe reply: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: Regarding the NATIVE VLAN (on a trunk or spanning tree)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART