From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2006 - 22:45:18 ART
Sometimes not having a network or two in your routing table can create
all kinds of problems beyond basic reachability (i.e. BGP next-hop
issues, multicast RPF failures, etc) ;-)
As far as being told what to advertise think about it like this. If you
do practice labs without being told to advertise every single network
and then have to deal with the issues it creates you are way ahead of
the game when you get to the real CCIE lab if they tell you everything
to advertise specifically.
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Schulz, Dave
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:38 PM
To: Scott Morris; Cagri Yucel; Group study
Subject: RE: Full connectivity revisited
Scott -
So, are you saying that you can add redistribution....if they don't tell
you not to? Shouldn't the scenario provide everything you need for full
reachability, without adding something that is not specifically
requested?
Dave Schulz
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:27 AM
To: 'Cagri Yucel'; 'Group study'
Subject: RE: Full connectivity revisited
You are not graded on optimal routing, unless the lab says so.
You are graded on full reachability (generally) based on lab
requirements.
So just read, and this will answer your question.
Like I always tell students, the lab MAY explicitly tell you some
redistribution to do, but that may not be the ONLY redistribution, just
the
ones they care about exactly where you do something!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Cagri Yucel
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:26 AM
To: Group study
Subject: Full connectivity revisited
I think I keep asking the same question but a recent post from some
other
member made me think about this:
In the real exam:
1. If a few of the loopbacks or networks are not explicitly told to be
announced. And if I don't do this. What will happen. (Ok in this case I
will
ask to the proctor). But what is the scoring approach here. Even if I do
whatever asked in all of the question can I still loose some points
because
there is no full connectivity ??? How many points should I expect to
loose
for this (whole lab ?) :)
2. Similar question, let's say if I have some suboptimal routing (but no
loops or flapping). All requirements are satisfied, full reachability
exists
but will I get some lost of points due to that ?
Am I getting too paronoid ?
-- -cagri
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART