Re: Full connectivity revisited

From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2006 - 13:30:31 ART


I think if it is said that you have to have a full connectivity
throughout a POD but some loopbacks were not explicitly mentioned, you
have bring them in one way or another.... but better not to break other
tasks.

just a thought though.

A.

Cagri Yucel wrote:
> I think I keep asking the same question but a recent post from some other
> member made me think about this:
>
> In the real exam:
>
> 1. If a few of the loopbacks or networks are not explicitly told to be
> announced. And if I don't do this. What will happen. (Ok in this case I will
> ask to the proctor). But what is the scoring approach here. Even if I do
> whatever asked in all of the question can I still loose some points because
> there is no full connectivity ??? How many points should I expect to loose
> for this (whole lab ?) :)
>
> 2. Similar question, let's say if I have some suboptimal routing (but no
> loops or flapping). All requirements are satisfied, full reachability exists
> but will I get some lost of points due to that ?
>
> Am I getting too paronoid ?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART