From: Nick Griffin (nick.jon.griffin@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2006 - 17:56:55 ART
No, it's a ccie Jedi Mind Trick.
On 10/23/06, Cagri Yucel <cyucel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No no no...
> It is not about fatigue or stupidity, don't blame yourself.
> It is common with practice labs. Some parts of the questions just appear
> after you finish with the test.
>
> :)
>
> Brian, Scott, is this some kind of invisible ink ? :-)
>
>
> On 10/23/06, Ryan <ryan95842@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks all,
> >
> > It appears apologies are in order. I went over the lab again this
> morning
> > (with a clear head) and sure enough, it's all there. I totally missed a
> > number of key elements (I swear they weren't there yesterday...).
> >
> > Chock it up to fatigue/stupidity/whatever...
> >
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/23/06, sheherezada@gmail.com <sheherezada@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > You should definitely advertise the loopbacks. By default, if you run
> > > more than one IGP on a router, you should advertise the loopbacks into
> > > your core IGP (this is usually OSPF), but pay attention to the area
> > > (some questions at a later time might have impact onto this). If
> > > there is no mention about other networks (but you are generally
> > > required to achieve full connectivity), redistribute them into all
> > > available protocols. Don't forget to use a route-map (with match
> > > interface).
> > >
> > > It is not complicated, you just need practice. In the real lab you
> > > will be doing this almost automatically.
> > >
> > > Mihai
> > > CCIE 16616
> > >
> > > P.S. I doubt that proctors will give you a clue on this (it is too
> > > basic), but there are some other ambiguous points where is safer not
> > > to make assumptions.
> > >
> > > On 10/23/06, Ryan <ryan95842@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I just finished a very frustrating lab. It's not that it was
> terribly
> > > > difficult, it was, but that it's not entirely clear what to do. I'm
> > > speaking
> > > > specifically of the advertisement of loopback address's. In the
> > > beginning of
> > > > the lab, it says all networks must be reachable etc. Half way
> through,
> >
> > > there
> > > > are VERY specific directions on how to put several loopbacks into
> the
> > > > routing table, but only about half of them though and no mention of
> > the
> > > > others. Based on this "trend" and the lack of specific details, I
> > > followed
> > > > the directions as carefully as I could and didn't do anything I was
> > not
> > > > asked to do. I get to the end and discover I was somehow supposed to
> > > > advertise the remaining loopbacks into the various protocols. No
> clue
> > is
> > > > given that I was to do this, and into which protocol (between 2 -4
> > > depending
> > > > on which router).
> > > >
> > > > So my question is, at what point is is safe to make assumptions and
> > just
> > > > start adding things in? How am I supposed to cope with missing
> > > information
> > > > in the practice labs?
> > > >
> > > > Is the real lab this vague and ambiguous?
> > > >
> > > > And at what point does "best practice" and "proper use" of a
> protocol
> > go
> > > out
> > > > the window? On the same lab, there was an objective to configure
> NAT,
> > > but it
> > > > was not NAT like one would typically deploy with the conventional
> > > > understanding of NAT, instead it very specific aspect of NAT, but no
> > > mention
> > > > of that. The solution had all sorts of things with nothing to do
> with
> > > NAT...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Ryan
> > > >
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -cagri
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART