From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2006 - 17:50:11 ART
It's generally defined at the beginning of the test. It's up to you to
remember to do it though! :)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, MCSE, CCDP, CCNA-WAN Switching, CCSP, Cable Communications Specialist,
IP Telephony Support Specialist, IP Telephony Design Specialist, CISSP
CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-J
swm@emanon.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Cagri Yucel
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 4:07 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: What are fair assumptions about practice labs?
No no no...
It is not about fatigue or stupidity, don't blame yourself.
It is common with practice labs. Some parts of the questions just appear
after you finish with the test.
:)
Brian, Scott, is this some kind of invisible ink ? :-)
On 10/23/06, Ryan <ryan95842@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks all,
>
> It appears apologies are in order. I went over the lab again this
> morning (with a clear head) and sure enough, it's all there. I totally
> missed a number of key elements (I swear they weren't there yesterday...).
>
> Chock it up to fatigue/stupidity/whatever...
>
>
> -Ryan
>
>
>
>
> On 10/23/06, sheherezada@gmail.com <sheherezada@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > You should definitely advertise the loopbacks. By default, if you
> > run more than one IGP on a router, you should advertise the
> > loopbacks into your core IGP (this is usually OSPF), but pay
> > attention to the area (some questions at a later time might have
> > impact onto this). If there is no mention about other networks (but
> > you are generally required to achieve full connectivity),
> > redistribute them into all available protocols. Don't forget to use
> > a route-map (with match interface).
> >
> > It is not complicated, you just need practice. In the real lab you
> > will be doing this almost automatically.
> >
> > Mihai
> > CCIE 16616
> >
> > P.S. I doubt that proctors will give you a clue on this (it is too
> > basic), but there are some other ambiguous points where is safer not
> > to make assumptions.
> >
> > On 10/23/06, Ryan <ryan95842@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I just finished a very frustrating lab. It's not that it was
> > > terribly difficult, it was, but that it's not entirely clear what
> > > to do. I'm
> > speaking
> > > specifically of the advertisement of loopback address's. In the
> > beginning of
> > > the lab, it says all networks must be reachable etc. Half way
> > > through,
>
> > there
> > > are VERY specific directions on how to put several loopbacks into
> > > the routing table, but only about half of them though and no
> > > mention of
> the
> > > others. Based on this "trend" and the lack of specific details, I
> > followed
> > > the directions as carefully as I could and didn't do anything I
> > > was
> not
> > > asked to do. I get to the end and discover I was somehow supposed
> > > to advertise the remaining loopbacks into the various protocols.
> > > No clue
> is
> > > given that I was to do this, and into which protocol (between 2 -4
> > depending
> > > on which router).
> > >
> > > So my question is, at what point is is safe to make assumptions
> > > and
> just
> > > start adding things in? How am I supposed to cope with missing
> > information
> > > in the practice labs?
> > >
> > > Is the real lab this vague and ambiguous?
> > >
> > > And at what point does "best practice" and "proper use" of a
> > > protocol
> go
> > out
> > > the window? On the same lab, there was an objective to configure
> > > NAT,
> > but it
> > > was not NAT like one would typically deploy with the conventional
> > > understanding of NAT, instead it very specific aspect of NAT, but
> > > no
> > mention
> > > of that. The solution had all sorts of things with nothing to do
> > > with
> > NAT...
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Ryan
> > >
> > >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- -cagri
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:06 ART