Re: IGP Routing loops (and prevention)

From: BurakGocmen@hsbc.com.tr
Date: Wed Oct 18 2006 - 12:04:59 ART

Next message: sujohn.mukherjee@eds.com: "ATM lab at home"
Previous message: Most Zahan: "it is a test"
Maybe in reply to: Cagri Yucel: "IGP Routing loops (and prevention)"
Next in thread: Jordan Gottlieb: "Re: IGP Routing loops (and prevention)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Cagri,

External eigrp routes' AD is 170. So eigrp prefers the routes with AD 90,
not the external routes coming from OSPF or RIP (AD 170).

Burak

                      "Cagri Yucel" To: "Group study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
                      <cyucel@gmail.com> cc:
                      Sent by: Subject: IGP Routing loops (and prevention)
                      nobody@groupstudy.co
                      m


                      18/10/2006 04:25 PM
                      Please respond to
                      "Cagri Yucel"

Hi all,

Is there a criteria to put tags and filter them while mutually
redistributing between two IGPs at two points ?

For example at a lab I see RIP<->OSPF distribution fully tagged and
filtered
on both protocols, on the other lab EIGRP<->OSPF is not tagged at all and
not causing any loops. What is the point I am missing ? What about
EIGRP<->RIP in the same manner ?

I know question sounds a bit humble but I am really confused.

--
-cagri

Next message: sujohn.mukherjee@eds.com: "ATM lab at home"
Previous message: Most Zahan: "it is a test"
Maybe in reply to: Cagri Yucel: "IGP Routing loops (and prevention)"
Next in thread: Jordan Gottlieb: "Re: IGP Routing loops (and prevention)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART