From: Jordan Gottlieb (thelieber@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2006 - 13:40:20 ART
The Netmaster DoIT labs cover these issues in depth. I highly recommend
that you get through this material. I could not have gotten through the
lab without this material. The greatest benifit I obtained was not
necessarily learning how to deal with routing loops, but how to spot them
quickly (or rule them out).
Sincerely,
Erez Jordan Gottlieb CCIE #17010
On 10/18/06, BurakGocmen@hsbc.com.tr <BurakGocmen@hsbc.com.tr> wrote:
>
> Hi Cagri,
>
> External eigrp routes' AD is 170. So eigrp prefers the routes with AD 90,
> not the external routes coming from OSPF or RIP (AD 170).
>
> Burak
>
>
>
>
>
> "Cagri Yucel" To: "Group study" <
> ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> <cyucel@gmail.com> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: IGP Routing loops
> (and prevention)
> nobody@groupstudy.co
> m
>
>
> 18/10/2006 04:25 PM
> Please respond to
> "Cagri Yucel"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a criteria to put tags and filter them while mutually
> redistributing between two IGPs at two points ?
>
> For example at a lab I see RIP<->OSPF distribution fully tagged and
> filtered
> on both protocols, on the other lab EIGRP<->OSPF is not tagged at all and
> not causing any loops. What is the point I am missing ? What about
> EIGRP<->RIP in the same manner ?
>
> I know question sounds a bit humble but I am really confused.
>
> --
> -cagri
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART