From: Frank (ocsic@web.de)
Date: Fri Oct 13 2006 - 15:08:13 ART
Alexei Monastyrnyi schrieb:
That's what i mean. Does not have so much sense to have an IPV6
access-list filter ipv4 rip traffic.
That can fool you, if you don't take care. Well, cheching the
access-list will bring out no matches
for port 520. So you will probably reveal that. But take care.
Frank
> that is weird....
>
> R6#sh ipv6 rip | in port
> RIP process "RIPng", port 521, multicast-group FF02::9, pid 166
> R6#conf t
> Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
> R6(config)#ipv6 access-list test
> R6(config-ipv6-acl)#perm udp any any eq ?
> ...
> rip Routing Information Protocol (router, in.routed, 520)
> snmp Simple Network Management Protocol (161)
> snmptrap SNMP Traps (162)
> R6(config-ipv6-acl)#^Z R6#sh
> *Mar 2 22:22:04.020: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
> R6#sh ver | in image
> System image file is "flash:c3640-js-mz.124-10.bin"
>
> A.
>
> on 10/12/2006 2:14 PM Ivan wrote:
>> RIPng - use 521 UDP port, but RIP - use 520
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps331/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008007c752.html#xtocid179522
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 12 October 2006 15:55, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> i can create an acl fpr ipv6 and just want to permit rip. Does this not
>>> implicitly mean i want to
>>> enable RIPng? So this would mean i want to enable rip udp port 521.
>>> But when is use:
>>>
>>> ipv6 access-list ACL_IPV6
>>> permit udp any eq rip any eq rip
>>>
>>>
>>> This is for ports udp 520. I had to use:
>>>
>>> ipv6 access-list ACL_IPV6
>>> permit udp any eq 521 any eq 521
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this a Bug?
>>>
>>>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART