RE: 160 instead of 40

From: Georgi Hristov Sinapov (gsinapov@telelink.bg)
Date: Fri Oct 13 2006 - 03:44:52 ART

• Next message: Kulcsár: "RE: OT Jobs in Europe"
• Previous message: Cagri Yucel: "Re: Problem with set metri command"
• Maybe in reply to: RalF ...: "160 instead of 40"
• Next in thread: RalF ...: "Re: 160 instead of 40"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Well...10ms is still a good serialization delay, right? With this Bc you
get one packet transmitted in each Tc interval.

Best e-gards,
Georgi Sinapov

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
RalF ...
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 6:46 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: 160 instead of 40

Hi,

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1834/products_feature_
guide09186a008008003f.html#wp1015437

Wondering why they used 160 instead of 40?

• Next message: Kulcsár: "RE: OT Jobs in Europe"
• Previous message: Cagri Yucel: "Re: Problem with set metri command"
• Maybe in reply to: RalF ...: "160 instead of 40"
• Next in thread: RalF ...: "Re: 160 instead of 40"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART