160 instead of 40

From: RalF ... (routeflap@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2006 - 12:45:54 ART

Hi,

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1834/products_feature_guide09186a008008003f.html#wp1015437

Wondering why they used 160 instead of 40? 

-- 

Thanks
RalF

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART