From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2006 - 13:48:34 ART
The route-map was meant to deny a default route coming from your
network but was accidentally left out in the first revision of the BB
configs. You can find the updated ones here:
http://www.internetworkexpert.com/downloads/bb3.txt
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> msaeed@uaeu.ac.ae
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:39 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Route-Map that does not Exist...IEWB BB3 Config
>
> Hello,
>
> I am facing problem that R4 is connected to BB3, and is advertising 5
BGP
> routes to BB3, but BB3 is not accepting it....here is the partial
config
> of PEER GROUP RACKS and R4 is member of that peer group on BB3. Now I
can
> see route-map IN applied but this IN route-map doesn't exist at all in
> the BB3 config. My perception is that because of this route-map BB3 is
> not accepting the bgp advertisements from R4, because IN route map
does
> not exist in config so everything is denied.....
>
> address-family ipv4
> neighbor RACKS activate
> neighbor RACKS send-community
> neighbor RACKS route-map IN in
> neighbor RACKS route-map BGP_OUT out
>
> And I have tested by just adding one statement
>
> BB3#route-map IN
>
> And BB3 has accepted the bgp routes from R4. Any one see any problem
what
> I am saying?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohammad Zahed Saeed
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART