From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2006 - 13:37:51 ART
Yeah, just remove that route-map IN.
On 10/12/06, msaeed@uaeu.ac.ae <msaeed@uaeu.ac.ae> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am facing problem that R4 is connected to BB3, and is advertising 5 BGP
> routes to BB3, but BB3 is not accepting it....here is the partial config
> of PEER GROUP RACKS and R4 is member of that peer group on BB3. Now I can
> see route-map IN applied but this IN route-map doesn't exist at all in
> the BB3 config. My perception is that because of this route-map BB3 is
> not accepting the bgp advertisements from R4, because IN route map does
> not exist in config so everything is denied.....
>
> address-family ipv4
> neighbor RACKS activate
> neighbor RACKS send-community
> neighbor RACKS route-map IN in
> neighbor RACKS route-map BGP_OUT out
>
> And I have tested by just adding one statement
>
> BB3#route-map IN
>
> And BB3 has accepted the bgp routes from R4. Any one see any problem what
> I am saying?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohammad Zahed Saeed
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART