From: Adam Bottomley (adam.bottomley@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 02 2006 - 14:48:39 ART
Hi
I believe the consensus on this mailing list was that "dampening 30"
is the solution to this question.
A lengthy discussion can be found in the archives:
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200605/msg01017.html
Adam
On 10/2/06, Noor Yousuf <nyousuf@cciint.com> wrote:
> Can some1 tell me the answer for this question?
>
> "When flapping happens 3 times, do not include to ip routing for
> 30seconds"
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Mohamed Saeed
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 7:57 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: "traffic-shape rate" command
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> You can configure generic traffic shaping using the following interface
> level command:
>
> traffic-shape rate bit-rate [burst-size [excess-burst-size]]
> [buffer-limit]
>
> I have two questions regarding this command. First, you can configure
> many "burst-size" (Bc) that would achieve the same target bit rate. The
> point is that when you change the value of the "burst-size", the
> internal time interval will change accordingly to achieve the configured
> target bit rate. If this is the case, what benefit I could get from
> changing the value of the "burst-size". I could simply leave it
> untouched and let the router calculates its value.
>
>
>
> The second question, how does the "buffer-limit" parameter affect the
> performance of the traffic shaping?
>
>
>
> Could anyone clarify these two points?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Mohamed Saeed, CCNP - CCIP
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:04 ART