Re:RIP version 1 & 2

From: Angelo De Guzman (a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2006 - 23:12:00 ART


Hi Mohammad,
   You may want to use debug ip rip to see what is happening on the router to
fully understand this. As the docs will tell you what you need to know knowing
the output of the debug will stengthen your understanding of the different RIP
versions.
My two cents,
Angelo

msaeed@uaeu.ac.ae (10/2/06 12:21 AM):
>
>Hi All,
>
>When you configiure RIP version 1, it sends version 1 and receive any, as
>it show in
>
>#sh ip prot
>
>Default version control: send version 1, receive any version
>
>And if you configure RIP version 2, it sends version 2 and receives
>version 2, as it shows
>
>#sh ip proto
>
>Default version control: send version 2, receive version 2
>
>Now my question is, in the second case above, can RIP receive and process
>if it receive Version 1 update from some of its neighbor?
>
>My question arises from the solution of IE Lab 9, task 4.7, where they
>configure send verion 1 & 2 under interface mode for some linux server
>which accepts only V1 updates, what if LINUX server send V1 updates? May
>be I am reading too deep in the question!:)
>
>Regards,
>
>Mohammad Zahid Saeed
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>***********************
>No virus was detected in the attachment no filename
>
>Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
>***********-***********
>

***********************
No virus was detected in the attachment no filename

Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS.
***********-***********



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:03 ART