From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2006 - 11:41:54 ART
Hey mate.
If you are confused with "IGP" semantics here, it only says that this
route had been in IGP routing table of the BGP router, when it was
injected in BGP via "network" statement.
INCOMPLETE, on the other hand, reflects that routes injected into BGP
via "redistribute ..." do not carry any origin protocol signs, so origin
info is missing here.
Think it this way. :-)
HTH
A.
on 9/27/2006 6:25 PM msaeed@uaeu.ac.ae wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I advertised 174.1.1.0/24 network in BGP on R1, when I see sh ip bgp
> 174.1.1.0 on R4 it mentions Origin IGP, can any one tell me why origin is
> IGP when route is advertised and learned via BGP? Both R1 and R4 are in
> same AS of BGP.
>
> Rack1R4#sh ip bgp 174.1.1.0
> BGP routing table entry for 174.1.1.0/24, version 17
> Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
> Not advertised to any peer
> Local
> 174.1.145.1 from 174.1.145.1 (150.1.1.1)
> Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, confed-internal, best
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohammad Zahid Saeed
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:41 ART