From: sabrina pittarel (sabri_esame@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Sep 13 2006 - 01:55:38 ART
I really don't understand what you are saying. As far as I know only ISIS and now IPv6 has problem with redistributing between protocols routes that are also connected.
RIP doesn't have the problem for sure:
Rack1R3#sh run | b router rip
router rip
version 2
network 204.12.1.0
no auto-summary
!
Rack1R3#sh run | b router ospf
router ospf 1
router-id 150.1.3.3
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute rip subnets
network 149.1.254.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
Remote OSPF router
Rack1R4#
Rack1R4#sh ip route | i 204.12
O E2 204.12.1.0/24 [110/20] via 149.1.254.5, 00:02:41, Serial1/0
Rack1R4#
ODR is a different story...the hub simply accepts routes from the spoke. These routes are the spoke's stub routes.
The network between the hub and the spokes is not a stub network so it won't be included on the ODR routing domain, hence won't be redistributed when you redistribute ODR.
Sabrina
----- Original Message ----
From: dfredrick@gmail.com
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 2:39:21 PM
Subject: Redistributing ODR and RIP
This is probably a very easy question... since it very hard to find.
But Why is it when you redistribute RIP into OSPF... or ODR into EIGRP... the connected routes are not redistributed with the redistribute rip or redistribute odr?
I can't seem to find any documentation on this... I remember reading something about it. something like... "the router will redistribute whatever the best routes are... so if a route is advertised in a routing protocol, but in the routing table it is show as a connected route... you have to use the redistribute connected command"
Something like that... but in effort to speed up my redistribution skills... I am noticing that some protocol will included connected... and some won't
Does any one have a good explaination? or a cisco weblink for reference?
Thanks for the help.
Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:40 ART