From: Niche (jackyliu419@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Sep 03 2006 - 06:54:24 ART
Hi guys,
The command should be "qos pre-classify", my mistake =P
Cheers~
Jacky
On 9/3/06, Niche <jackyliu419@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Two sites are being connected via GRE tunnel, and using OSPF for
> routing information exchange.
>
> Requirement - QoS for traffic control but many of you may already know
> there are not much QoS can do to the GRE tunnel. So I used
> "qos-preclassify" command on the tunnel interface and configure
> appropriate QoS configuration in the service policy for the physical
> interfaces at both sites. The matching method is simple access-group
> with protocol type and ip addresses, and here come the odd...
>
> When I check the hit count of the ACLs that are being used by the
> service policy, the number is zero. I am sure there are matching
> traffic types passing throught the interface, so it make me wonder
> what's wrong.
>
> Ok, according to Cisco web information, only term "physical interface"
> is mentioned in the article. So, how about logical interface? e.g.
> multilink interface, FR sub-interface..etc. I confess that the service
> policies for both of sites are being bound on logical interfaces
> instead of physical one.
>
> Cheers~
> Jacky
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:39 ART