From: sabrina pittarel (sabri_esame@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Sep 02 2006 - 15:31:16 ART
Ehi ehi,
you could be hurting the feeling of some poor Cisco developer in this forum :-)
They put a comment at least...............sometimes
R4#ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 136.1.145.5
Repeat count [5]:
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]: y
Source address or interface: e0/0
% Invalid source. Must use IP address or full interface name without spaces (e.g. Serial0/1)
Source address or interface:
Sabrina
----- Original Message ----
From: Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
To: swm@emanon.com; Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Saturday, September 2, 2006 11:04:06 AM
Subject: RE: ping ff02::2 % Bad interface
I wasn't any way in the least serious with my reply. I'll add a double
smiley face next time ;-)
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 10:43 AM
To: Brian Dennis; 'Victor Cappuccio'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ping ff02::2 % Bad interface
But doesn't that translate into bad for the user? See, you just have
the programmer's perspective. IMHO, they're job is to make OUR lives
easier, not vice-versa! (And, as if IOS isn't big enough anyway....
Or, if it was properly designed to begin with, they'd like to a module
already programmed in (like for IPv4, etc) that works)
;)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Dennis [mailto:bdennis@internetworkexpert.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 1:07 PM
To: Scott Morris; Victor Cappuccio; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ping ff02::2 % Bad interface
Scott,
It's not bad programming. It's just "efficient" programming.
If they let you enter all of those different options it would take more
lines of code in the IOS and more processing power to find the matching
interface ;-)
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 7:44 AM
To: 'Victor Cappuccio'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ping ff02::2 % Bad interface
You have to spell it out. Bad programming.
Serial0/0.41
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 1:03 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ping ff02::2 % Bad interface
Hi guys, please if anyone know how is the correct way to put the output
interface here?
Thanks
Victor.-
R4#ping ff02::2
Output Interface: s0/0.41
% Bad interface
R4#ping ff02::2
Output Interface: s 0/0.41
% Bad interface
R4#ping ff02::2
Output Interface: s0/0.41
% Bad interface
R4#ping ff02::2
Output Interface: s 0 / 0 . 41
% Bad interface
R4#ping ff02::2
Output Interface: s 0/0.41
% Bad interface
R4#ping ff02::2
Output Interface: s0/0 .41
% Bad interface
R4#ping ff02::2
Output Interface: s0/0 .41
% Bad interface
R4#ping ff02::2
Output Interface: s 0 / 0.41
% Bad interface
R4#
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:39 ART