From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@multimax.com)
Date: Tue Aug 29 2006 - 09:57:55 ART
Personally, I think it'd be a really bad idea. They might not mark it
wrong, but doing things to increase the complexity of your lab seems
like time ill-spent. Also, there is always the possibility of bugs
existing in the code that they use that affect manually-configured
timers. I wouldn't risk it. These aren't 2500s anymore. If it take
your OSPF 6 seconds to converge, isn't that fast enough?
Chuck Church
Network Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Multimax, Inc.
Enterprise Network Engineering
Home Office - 864-335-9473
Cell - 864-266-3978
cchurch@multimax.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Leo Boulton
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:04 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Changing Timers for Routing Protocols
>
> Hi All: I'm new to the list.
>
> Quick/simple question: Do you think it is a good idea to
> change the timers for dynamic routing protocols such as OPSF,
> to speed up adjecency time? Do you think that the question
> qould be marked as wrong if they didn't ask you for that?
>
> Thanks
> -LB
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:59 ART