From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Sat Aug 26 2006 - 08:03:37 ART
The channel-group concept on T1 came way before QoS concepts did! It was to
have a single T1 but only use channels 1-4 (256K) for one connection,
channels 5-8 (256K) for a second connection, and the remaining channels for
a third.
I suppose you could use it in the manner you described, but once you start
applying routing and it sees a path to go on that may not work the way you
want without policy routing as well!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
chris
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 3:21 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: channel-group
Scott , Would he than be referring to QoS on the T1 - T1 is channelized by
grouping channels you are in effect doing qos , rather brilliant now that i
think of it a Qos solution with minimal drops - i want one channel for
routing updates - half the channel one way half the other for example.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:58 ART