From: James Nendel (james.nendel@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Aug 26 2006 - 02:56:16 ART
but if I place the service-policy on a Virtual-tem ?
On 8/26/06, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>
> If you placed a service-policy on a frame-relay interface the was running
> PPPoFR, then the only type of traffic that would exist at that physical
> interface would be PPP stuff, not tcp, udp, etc.
>
> So that wouldn't help you much!
>
>
> Scott Morris, *CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153**, CISSP, et al.*
> *CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J*
> IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* James Nendel [mailto:james.nendel@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 26, 2006 1:31 AM
> *To:* swm@emanon.com
> *Cc:* ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: QoS -- SCOTT or the BRIANS
>
>
> Is this concept is the same for main frame-relay interfaces using
> virtual-templates ?
> Thanks you are the Man!!
>
>
> On 8/26/06, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com > wrote:
> >
> > You don't. At least not for queuing. Being a completely virtual
> > interface,
> > there aren't any queues associated with them, and the concept of things
> > tearing down and setting up frequently would wreak havoc with the
> > router's
> > memory management! (Remember that virtual-templates and stuff started
> > in
> > the dialer world, so you get to inherit the bad things too!)
> >
> > Check out:
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/pppoe_qos_dsl.html
> >
> > Yes, it has to do with DSL modems and stuff, but it explains a bit about
> > the
> > concepts and restrictions, but also alludes to some different logic you
> > may
> > be able to use with your other interfaces to achieve what you want.
> >
> > If you search google for 'virtual-template service-policy' you may find
> > some
> > e-mail discussions on the cisco-nsp list from puck essentially going
> > over
> > the same thing.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> > JNCIE
> > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > James Nendel
> > Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 1:04 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: QoS -- SCOTT or the BRIANS
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > How do I enable CBWFQ in a Frame-relay p2p subinterface that is using a
> > virtual-template ?
> >
> > config-if)#service-policy out DEFAULT
> > Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing will be applied only to the
> > Virtual-Access interfaces associated with an MLP bundle.
> >
> > #show policy-map interface virtual-template 1
> > Virtual-Template1
> >
> > Service-policy output: DEFAULT
> >
> > Service policy content is displayed only for cloned interfaces only
> > such
> > as vaccess and sessions
> >
> > Please help
> > Thx
> > James
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:58 ART