From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Aug 21 2006 - 16:51:55 ART
The virtual-link is area 0. You don't need a physical interface to be
assigned to area 0 for this to work.
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Tim Chan
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 2:12 PM
> To: slammer@broadpark.no; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IEWB CORE Lab3 Virtual link
>
> I would agree that you need an area 0 to implement a virtual link.
But if
> you read in the IE
> forum, someone got this to work without an area 0 just by changing the
IOS
> to 12.2.15-T17.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: slammer@broadpark.no
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 11:14:52 AM
> Subject: IEWB CORE Lab3 Virtual link
>
> Is it necessary for at least one interface to be in area 0 on R3 in
order
> to fulfill task 4.5 and 4.8?
>
> RFC3509 seems to indicate that Cisco requires an ABR to have at least
one
> active interface in the backbone area in order for the VL,s to become
> active
> Cant get this thing working
>
> Help anyone !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:58 ART