Re: extended access-list

From: Ivan (ivan@iip.net)
Date: Mon Aug 21 2006 - 07:13:03 ART

• Next message: Aamir Aziz: "Re: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack"
• Previous message: Peter Plak: "Re: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack"
• Maybe in reply to: ELDHO PAUL: "extended access-list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Also RST-bit will match.

> Established will match for a packet with a ACK bit set in the packet.
>
> SYN only, no match.
>
> ... ACK set... match.
>
> On 8/18/06, ELDHO PAUL <cciein2006@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Can somebody tell me what difference will the 'established' keyword make
> > in an extended access-list.
> > Regards,
> > Eldho.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

-- 
Ivan

• Next message: Aamir Aziz: "Re: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack"
• Previous message: Peter Plak: "Re: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack"
• Maybe in reply to: ELDHO PAUL: "extended access-list"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:58 ART