From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Sat Aug 19 2006 - 00:51:42 ART
Hi Guys, please take a look at this link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk824/technologies_tech_note09186a00800
94978.shtml
Regards
Victor.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de
Michael Stout
Enviado el: Viernes, 18 de Agosto de 2006 11:44 p.m.
Para: masterdt@yahoo.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: RE: CEF and QOS
I know of two ways to do wred.
The first, and i believe most preferable is to use MQC.
using wred with class based qos will require cef.
However, i am unable to find that requirement in the docs, currently.
The second is to use wred on the interface.
I don't think the interface method requires cef.
After some deliberation i think wred is a worthwihile queueing strategy
for circuits that experience a high number of output drops.
If anybody knows more about this subject or has used it effectivly in
production environments, I would be greatful to hear your valuable input.
Thank You.
Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: David Timmons <masterdt@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: David Timmons <masterdt@yahoo.com>
To: CCIElab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: CEF and QOS
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Hi,
Just wondering if we have to worry about turning off CEF to get QOS
parameters to work properly. For example, if we would like to
configure explicit congestion notification for WRED, do we have to
turn off CEF.
Configuration:
Policy-map WREDandECN
class class-default
bandwidth percent 22
random-detect
random-detect ecn
s0/0
encapsulation frame-relay
service-policy out WREDandECN
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART