From: Dunbar, Priscilla (priscilla.dunbar@eds.com)
Date: Fri Aug 18 2006 - 16:54:04 ART
Traffic-share min will only use the least cost route. If you add the
keyword across-interfaces it will balance across multiple interfaces
only if they are least cost and equal. A reason for having this
configured for unequal routes would be to reduce convergence time.
Priscilla
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Radoslav Vasilev
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 4:54 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: EIGRP && traffic-share min accross-interfaces
Hi Group,
Could anyone shed some lights as how the ``traffic-share min
accross-interfaces`` command is supposed to be used?
What I could find as explenation for it is that when having multiple
unequal-cost EIGRP routes, we can actually say:
- do not load-balance accross all those routes (the default is to
because of the router command ``traffic-share balanced`` command)
BUT
- install the unequal routes in the routing tables and still use only
the best of them (by using the ``traffic-hare min accross-interfaces``
command)
Could someone confirm this as correct usage and also - if it is, could
you explain how the IOS actually manages to have two routes in the
routing table and still use only one of them?
thanks!
Rado
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART