EIGRP && traffic-share min accross-interfaces

From: Radoslav Vasilev (deckland@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 18 2006 - 06:54:12 ART


Hi Group,

Could anyone shed some lights as how the ``traffic-share min
accross-interfaces`` command is supposed to be used?
What I could find as explenation for it is that when having multiple
unequal-cost EIGRP routes, we can actually say:

- do not load-balance accross all those routes (the default is to because of
the router command ``traffic-share balanced`` command)

 BUT
- install the unequal routes in the routing tables and still use only the
best of them
 (by using the ``traffic-hare min accross-interfaces`` command)

Could someone confirm this as correct usage and also - if it is, could you
explain how the IOS actually manages to have two routes in the routing table
and still use only one of them?

thanks!
Rado



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART