From: roehsler (roehsler@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Aug 17 2006 - 09:49:01 ART
Thanks to everyone for the responses.
David
On 8/16/06, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> It can use more than the specified bandwidth, however traffic in
> excess of the rate is not guaranteed low latency. If there is
> congestion and traffic exceeds the rate it will be policed.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > roehsler
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 3:43 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: LLQ and policing
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just trying to nail down an understanding of LLQ.
> >
> > When you specify the amount of bandwidth that LLQ traffic can have
> > prioritized, can that class of traffic utilize more available
> > bandwidth if there is not congestion on the link? In other words is
> > the prioritized traffic policed to that specified limit?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART