From: Paul Dardinski (pauld@marshallcomm.com)
Date: Sat Aug 12 2006 - 09:47:15 ART
Thanks Dave. I knew that physical would hit all the dlci's. I really
shouldn't have put subint in the question. I simply had meant that for
physical int whether it made a difference whether put in map-class or
just put the statement on the physical interface? I'm assuming it
shouldn't, just wanted to verify.
-----Original Message-----
From: Schulz, Dave [mailto:DSchulz@dpsciences.com]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:05 PM
To: Paul Dardinski
Subject: RE: FRTS fragmentation
Paul -
This would depend on the specific scenario.....whether you want to apply
it to all dlci, or a single dlci...
!
interface Serial0/0
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay class FRAG <- use this to fragment on all dlci's
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.3 103 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.1 102
frame-relay map ip 172.16.1.2 102 broadcast
frame-relay interface-dlci 102 <- use this to fragment on a specific
dlci
class FRAG
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
map-class frame-relay FRAG
frame-relay fair-queue
frame-relay fragment 40
!
Confirm your configurations with the show frame-relay fragment
command.....
R1#sh fram frag
interface dlci frag-type size in-frag out-frag
dropped-frag
Se0/0 102 end-to-end 40 293 523 0
Se0/0 103 end-to-end 40 0 251 0
Se0/0 104 end-to-end 40 0 0 0
R1#
I hope this helps!
Dave Schulz
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Dardinski
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 2:55 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: FRTS fragmentation
According to cco, they show examples of fragmentation enabled on
map-class OR directly on the physical/subinterface. Inherently does it
make a difference at which level it is enabled?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART