From: Jordan Gottlieb (thelieber@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 08 2006 - 12:03:45 ART
IGMP snooping would work just fine. But I don't believe the "no switchport"
config is valid on the two ports from the original config (at least for
2950s). Just set the required ports to the desired VLAN and you should be
OK. IGMP snooping is on by default.
Sincerely,
Jordan
On 8/7/06, Aamir Aziz <aamiraz77@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> so in that case for 2950 IGMP snooping would be the best solution which is
> enabled by default?
>
> thanks
>
>
> On 8/6/06, Jordan Gottlieb <thelieber@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This should work on a 3550. But I do not believe this is a valid config
> > on a 2950 (since it can not route between vlans). The only layer 3
> > functionality on a 2950 that I know of is mgmt vlan and marking via ACL.
> >
> > On 8/5/06, Aamir Aziz < aamiraz77@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there ppl,
> >
> > I have a question, two switches Sw1 and Sw2 (both 2950), on Sw1 i have a
> > server running multicast application sending a stream to a client on
> > Sw2,
> > the requirement is that multicast packets should only be sent and
> > received
> > between the server on Sw1 and client on Sw2 so will the following
> > configuration be enough:
> >
> > Sw1:
> > Ip multicast-routing
> > int fa0/1
> > no switchport
> > ip pim dense-mode
> >
> > Sw2:
> > Ip multicast-routing
> > int fa0/1
> > no switchport
> > ip pim dense-mode
> >
> > Do i need to put an IP on the interfaces or not?
> >
> > thanks
> > Aamir
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:56 ART