From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Aug 04 2006 - 10:34:50 ART
It's about as much fun there as talking to your fellow candidates to discuss
their router-id strategy on the day of the lab. ;) tsk, tsk.
Unless you are using a routing protocol with a BB router that passes a
router-id, then it's not the end of the world.
As a side note, I would like to think that unless you are supposed to
exchanging routing information between pods (not likely) that the proctors
would have separate OSPF processes going on with the BB routers. Just my
thoughts there.
But you're correct, if nothing is told to you in the instructions you are
free to do what you want.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Bajo
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 8:03 AM
To: ELDHO PAUL
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RouterID
Hi Eldho,
Do as they tell you. If they do not tell you , you have the freedom.
Just make sure your ID is unique (does not collide with other via the
backbone routers....so do not use 1.1.1.1 for example....use loopbacks,
anything using your rack number...etc)....
On 8/4/06, ELDHO PAUL <cciein2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> In the CCIE lab are we supposed to configure an existing loopback
> address as the router id of OSPF or BGP process or Do we have the
> freedom of configuring it as we wish unless specified.
>
> Please advice.
> Regards,
> Eldho.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Kind Regards,Bajo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:56 ART