From: Joe Gagznos (joegagznos@comcast.net)
Date: Sat Jul 29 2006 - 22:56:35 ART
I have 2 routers connected through frame relay (routers R1 and R2). I am
running PPP over Frame Relay with the use of a virtual template on each
side. On R1, I have two connected interfaces that I would like to advertise
to R2. Here are the relevant configs on both R1 and R2:
R1
interface Ethernet0/0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 5
ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/0.2
encapsulation dot1Q 55
ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay interface-dlci 503 ppp Virtual-Template1
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
interface Virtual-Template1
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
!
router eigrp 10
network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
network 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255
network 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255
metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0
no auto-summary
eigrp router-id 1.1.1.1
R1#ping 10.0.0.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 60/61/64 ms
R1#
R1#sh ip eigrp neig
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 10
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 10.0.0.2 Vi1 13 00:10:40 1 3000 0 19
R1#sh ip eigrp top
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(10)/ID(1.1.1.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 10.0.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 282603
via Connected, Ethernet0/0.2
P 10.0.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 282603
via Connected, Ethernet0/0.1
R2
interface Loopback0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial1/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay interface-dlci 305 ppp Virtual-Template1
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
interface Virtual-Template1
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
!
router eigrp 10
network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
metric weights 0 1 1 1 0 0
no auto-summary
eigrp router-id 2.2.2.2
R2#ping 10.0.0.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.0.0.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 60/61/64 ms
R2#
R2#sh ip eigrp neig
IP-EIGRP neighbors for process 10
H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq
(sec) (ms) Cnt Num
0 10.0.0.1 Vi1 10 00:09:43 1 4500 0 19
R2#sh ip eigrp top
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(10)/ID(2.2.2.2)
R2#
When I do a debug ip eigrp on R2, R2 is seeing the routes come in from R1.
Why would R2 not be installing these routes into the topology table?
R2#clear ip eigrp neig
R2#
*Mar 1 00:46:52.231: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 10: Neighbor 10.0.0.1
(Virtual-Access1) is down: manually cleared
*Mar 1 00:46:52.979: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(0) 10: Neighbor 10.0.0.1
(Virtual-Access1) is up: new adjacency
R2#
*Mar 1 00:46:57.139: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:10): Processing
incoming UPDATE packet
*Mar 1 00:46:57.139: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:10): Int 10.0.2.0/24
M 4294967295 - 4294967040 2585600 SM 282603 - 256000 25600
*Mar 1 00:46:57.139: IP-EIGRP(Default-IP-Routing-Table:10): Int 10.0.1.0/24
M 4294967295 - 4294967040 2585600 SM 282603 - 256000 25600
R2#sh ip eigrp top
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(10)/ID(2.2.2.2)
R2#
Any one have any ideas on what I am doing wrong here?
Regards,
Joe Gagznos
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART