From: Russell Kelly \(rukelly\) (rukelly@cisco.com)
Date: Sat Jul 29 2006 - 20:05:57 ART
Not quite sure what you want to do - go out of r2 if r3 goes down and
vica versa ??--- Thinking GLBP or HSRP? --- r1 then just arps as a
normal client? Proxy arp poss comes into play on r2/r3 as well - is
this what you're trying to achieve
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: 29 July 2006 23:10
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Need a hint for a real world taks.
Ohhh sorry I forgot to say that R2 and R3 are non Cisco, so CDP is not
available also, in case off thinking of Route-maps with ip next-hop
values.
_____
De: Victor Cappuccio [mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com]
Enviado el: Sabado, 29 de Julio de 2006 06:02 p.m.
Para: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Asunto: Need a hint for a real world taks.
Guys,
What if we have 3 routers connected like in this:
R1 ==A= Sw1 ==T== Sw2 =A==R2-L0
=A==R3-L0
A = Access
T = Trunk
If the ASCII diagram came mess up, R1 connects via Vlan X to Sw1 f0/1,
sw1 uses f0/13 to trunk with sw2 f0/13, sw2 connects with R2 using f0/2
and with
R3 using f0/3 in Vlan X
Please note that Im not allowed to use Dynamic Routing for this
scenario (real World Taks).
So, I need to find a way other than using tunnels interfaces to get rid
of the static route create at R1, if R2 or R3 Ethernet goes down. Is
there anyway you can think to solve this task? The use on tunneling
here is not scalable (I think), because you will need more ip addressing
from the tunnels and more ip routes
Any hint for this task please?
Thanks
Victor.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART