RE: Bridge is still a valid CCIE topic now?

From: Michael Stout (michaelgstout@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 28 2006 - 11:59:01 ART

Next message: Mark Lasarko: "Fallback Bridging"
Previous message: Kurniawan Martin: "RE: CCNA and CCNP Study Books On Internet"
Maybe in reply to: bindong.shi@gmail.com: "Bridge is still a valid CCIE topic now?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

bridging is a very important engineering topic.

Lots of cool ways to use a bridge

--------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Jens Petter" <jenseike@start.no>
  Reply-To: "Jens Petter" <jenseike@start.no>
  To: <bindong.shi@gmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
  Subject: RE: Bridge is still a valid CCIE topic now?
  Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:22:58 +0200
  Bridging is a topic it is in fact one of the main topics, it has
  never been
  gone :

  Bridging and Switching
  Frame relay
  Catalyst configuration: VLANs, VTP, STP, trunk, management, features,
  advanced configuration, Layer 3

it is dlsw that is taken out of the blueprint

Jens

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
  Of
  bindong.shi@gmail.com
  Sent: 28. juli 2006 13:02
  To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
  Subject: Bridge is still a valid CCIE topic now?

  hi group:
  I noticed a few bridge questions in the IEWB ver 3.0, so need to
  check with
  you whether it is still a valid topic?

thanks

  _______________________________________________________________________
  Subscription information may be found at:
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Next message: Mark Lasarko: "Fallback Bridging"
Previous message: Kurniawan Martin: "RE: CCNA and CCNP Study Books On Internet"
Maybe in reply to: bindong.shi@gmail.com: "Bridge is still a valid CCIE topic now?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART