From: Kay D (krsna83@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jul 24 2006 - 14:23:08 ART
Thanks James , Unfortunately 3750 does not support GLBP ,so will have to go
for another option .
Kay
On 7/24/06, James Ventre <messageboard@ventrefamily.com> wrote:
>
> *>Kay D wrote:
> >HSRP with 1 group does not do equal Load distribution*
>
> I said "1 group" as in 1 GLBP group, not 1 HSRP group.
>
>
> Which NIC the server uses is goverened by your NIC teaming software. You
> set a preferred NIC, and the failback options as well as keepalives
> (recommended).
>
> I'm not sure if it's supported on a 3750, but the Feature Navigator will
> tell you.
> http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/CFN/jsp/index.jsp
>
> James
>
>
>
>
>
> Kay D wrote:
>
> Hi James ,
> HSRP with 1 group does not do equal Load distribution as
> with 2 groups . But GLBP seems to be a good option, but i am looking forward
> to deploy it in a 3750 . Does a 3750 support GLBP ?
>
> Is there an application or some kinda mechanism ,,, which make a server to
> choose the right NIC . For eg if the 3750 is the active switch for Server1
> ,,, i would like to control the server to send traffic only thru first NIC
> ,,,,as the second NIC shold be used until the link to switch 1 is down,,so
> that it directs traffic thru the second uplink .
>
>
> TIA
> Kay D
>
> On 7/24/06, James Ventre < messageboard@ventrefamily.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So avoiding these disadvantages ,,, is is there another solution ?
> >
> > 1 Group. GLBP.
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kay D wrote:
> > > Is there a better way of doing MHSRP with Load Balancing in mind
> > >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > 2 switches cat1 and cat2 ,,,with cat1 connected to servers s1 ,s2 (at
> > > fa0/1,fa0/2)and cat2 connected to servers s3,s4 (at f0/1 , f0/2) . I
> > have
> > > connected servers s1,s2 to cat2
> > > at (fa0/3 , fa0/4) and similiarly i have connected servers s3 , s4 to
> > cat1
> > > 's fa0/3 , fa0/4 for redundancy .
> > >
> > > Note: All the ports are in one vlan ie vlan 2
> > >
> > > Now i am running MHSRP ,
> > >
> > > I would like to restrict the number of MHSRP groups to 2 ,where
> > >
> > > a.)cat1 is active for GROUP 1(value of 110) AND passive for GROUP 2
> > > b.)cat2 is active for GROUP 2(value of 110) and passive for GROUP 1
> > >
> > > Now i track the interface f0/1 at cat1 , if f0/1 is down then i reduce
> > the
> > > priority of group 1 to 90 ,,such that the cat2 would take over as
> > active for
> > > s1
> > >
> > > So the question is based on the following ?
> > >
> > > i run MSHRP on a vlan 2, and if fa0/1 on cat1 is down then all the
> > traffic
> > > from s2 also would go to cat2 eventhough Fa0/2 is up on cat1 .
> > >
> > > if i am running MHSRP on fa0/1 ,2,3,4 routed ports individually
> > ,,,and i
> > > need to run 8 MHSRP groups which needs more processing power , if
> > scale
> > > the number of servers to
> > > a larger number .
> > >
> > > So avoiding these disadvantages ,,, is is there another solution ?
> > >
> > > Apologies for making it so long
> > >
> > > TIA ,
> > > Kay D
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/396 - Release Date: 7/24/2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART